The Dead Game

If there are two people in a room and you are one of them.
Your loved one (any 1 person) is the other person in there with you.

There is a door, and only one of you can leave.

In order to leave, one of you must die.

* * *

Would you sacrifice yourself to let the other person live?
Or would you kill him/her, in order to leave?

*The rules are simple:

If you both decide to stay and die together on the room, all of your bloodline and friends will all die.
(So if you two stay in the room because nobody wants to sacrifice/kill, everyone you know or know you will die)

What is your play?

* * *

Now if the other person is substituted with a stranger's infant child.

The same rules apply.
What are you going to do?

Here are some options:

Option A, sacrifice yourself. The infant dies anyway. Hence everyone you know ceases to exist.

Option B, Kill the child and get on with it.
I would go with this one because the child hasn't lived yet, week not for much. Sacrificing a child for your entire bloodline and friends seems like a better deal.

Either way, you're going to get blood on your hands.

So would you prefer to have thousands die in vain, because you had morals?
Or would you have one, innocent and pure being die, and save thousands?

Stop avoiding the problem (YES YOU)

Erratic Behaviour